Is this really necessary?

**Ernie** Mon 07 Jul 2008, 15:31

Is it? I believe the courtroom isn't. I need more people to believe that. That's my debate. Shocked

**kareljanis** Mon 07 Jul 2008, 18:05

I'm on your side!

**10art1** Tue 08 Jul 2008, 04:40

I'm against the defendants (and I'm the judge, but i'll be fair Wink

). let the court begin! I call Ernie to the stand. Ernie, why would you think that the court bforum is pontless

**Ernie** Tue 08 Jul 2008, 11:34

Isn't this what the poll section is about?

**Katanga** Tue 08 Jul 2008, 13:56

objection! (I'm on the affirmative side). This is located in the poll section, but here we actually get sides and debate to what we beleive and the side that debates the most well wins the debate as such! Defendent team, what do you have to say to that?!

**10art1** Tue 08 Jul 2008, 16:53

in addition,

Ernie wrote: There is no reason for the court room

, the case can be closed by his statement: Its purely for our amusement

**kareljanis** Tue 08 Jul 2008, 23:40

There aren't that many debates anyway (like 2)

**10art1** Wed 09 Jul 2008, 05:26

kareljanis wrote:There aren't that many debates anyway (like 2)

for now... but later when people get in disputes a normal court would laugh at...

**kareljanis** Wed 09 Jul 2008, 10:27

What if no one does? no one has been talking on the debates/polls section for awhile.

**Ernie** Wed 09 Jul 2008, 12:38

kareljanis wrote:There aren't that many debates anyway (like 2)

Exactly. Why would we need a whole section for so few debates?

**10art1** Wed 09 Jul 2008, 18:37

to expand the forum. concentrated sucess only leads to a depressive explosion

**kareljanis** Wed 09 Jul 2008, 19:53

wat does that even mean?

**Ernie** Wed 09 Jul 2008, 20:53

Something stupid.

pteri forever Sat 12 Jul 2008, 02:38

Ernie wrote:
kareljanis wrote:There aren't that many debates anyway (like 2)
Exactly. Why would we need a whole section for so few debates?

Ok. I object. We don't need a new section for debates, but these aren't even debates. Real debates have 3 people on each side, speaking in the designated order.

**kareljanis** Sat 12 Jul 2008, 12:02

thos aren't the designated rules for every debate in the world, we do it differently

**10art1** Sat 12 Jul 2008, 14:32

Ernie wrote: something stupid

yo mama!

**10art1** Sat 12 Jul 2008, 14:32

and now you can't say new post!

**kareljanis** Sat 12 Jul 2008, 16:01

i can if i also say a message with it

new post

**10art1** Sun 13 Jul 2008, 15:08

**Katanga** Sun 13 Jul 2008, 15:28

pteri, most debates actually have 2 people per side (like Monk debates)

**10art1** Sun 13 Jul 2008, 15:56

are most peacekeepers monks?

**kareljanis** Sun 13 Jul 2008, 18:33

**10art1** Sun 13 Jul 2008, 19:34

lol i'll go find a picture on the internet making fun of monks...

**Katanga** Mon 14 Jul 2008, 21:30

well who won the debate? We need some people who werent involved to post who they think won...

**10art1** Tue 15 Jul 2008, 05:36

monks like rollercoasters lol

Sponsored content

Is this really necessary?

Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Re: Is this really necessary?

Sun	Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat
	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30